This theory proposes that before time existed every tidbit of matter within our entire Universe was packed into an infinitely dense singularity before it exploded and evolved into the universe we know today. If this theory is correct, then at that time (before time) everything that would one day become you, me, and everything we know were literally ONE.
Wikipedia definition:
"The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model that describes the early development of the Universe. According to the theory, the Big Bang occurred approximately 13.798 ± 0.037 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe. At this time, the Universe was in an extremely hot and dense state and began expanding rapidly. After the initial expansion, the Universe cooled sufficiently to allow energy to be converted into various subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons. Though simple atomic nuclei formed within the first three minutes after the Big Bang, thousands of years passed before the first electrically neutral atoms formed. The majority of atoms that were produced by the Big Bang are hydrogen, along with helium and traces of lithium. Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies, and the heavier elements were synthesized either within stars or during supernovae." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
Question:
If the Big Bang theory is true, if all the matter within our entire Universe was packed into an infinitely dense singularity that then exploded/expanded/evolved into the Universe we know today... then it seems as though it would have done so with a force greater than any supernova. Wouldn't the mass/density of the Pre-Big Bang Singularity have been far greater than any existing star... so why is it that contemporary cosmologists attribute the formation/creation of the heavy elements to supernova? Wouldn't the Big Bang have had a force significant enough to create the heavy elements?
Also, most contemporary cosmologists/Big Bang believers discuss the development of matter in an ascending order... meaning they discuss how the smallest/simplest forms of matter (such as bosons, quarks, and leptons) developed before the larger/complex forms of matter came into existence. If true... if matter increased in complexity over time... then this further supports the Cyclical Snowball theory.
Wikipedia definition:
"The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model that describes the early development of the Universe. According to the theory, the Big Bang occurred approximately 13.798 ± 0.037 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe. At this time, the Universe was in an extremely hot and dense state and began expanding rapidly. After the initial expansion, the Universe cooled sufficiently to allow energy to be converted into various subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons. Though simple atomic nuclei formed within the first three minutes after the Big Bang, thousands of years passed before the first electrically neutral atoms formed. The majority of atoms that were produced by the Big Bang are hydrogen, along with helium and traces of lithium. Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies, and the heavier elements were synthesized either within stars or during supernovae." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
Question:
If the Big Bang theory is true, if all the matter within our entire Universe was packed into an infinitely dense singularity that then exploded/expanded/evolved into the Universe we know today... then it seems as though it would have done so with a force greater than any supernova. Wouldn't the mass/density of the Pre-Big Bang Singularity have been far greater than any existing star... so why is it that contemporary cosmologists attribute the formation/creation of the heavy elements to supernova? Wouldn't the Big Bang have had a force significant enough to create the heavy elements?
Also, most contemporary cosmologists/Big Bang believers discuss the development of matter in an ascending order... meaning they discuss how the smallest/simplest forms of matter (such as bosons, quarks, and leptons) developed before the larger/complex forms of matter came into existence. If true... if matter increased in complexity over time... then this further supports the Cyclical Snowball theory.